Drilling Cost Per Foot

Using drilling parameters information to get best recommended bit to drill a new holes 

  • Better drilling performance leads to less time and less operational cost  -  best bit or bits will be with less CPF and highest ROP in the same time exert high SE 


  • Used equations 



  • * CPF Cost Per Foot, * SE Specific Energy 
  • Selection Criteria 
  • Using set of offset wells’ drilling data which belong to the same area and have the following features
  • The same footage or nearly the same footage
  • The same depth interval
  • The same lithology and formation
  • The same operational drilling parameters
  • The same bit size and type
  • The bits should be 1st run
  • Selection Software tool 
  • DPA – Drilling Performance analyzer V 1.0.0.26


Selection criteria table of data for sack of verification and reference 


  • Bit serial No.
  • Bit type
  • Bit size (in)
  • Supplier
  • Drilled (m)
  • CPF ($/ft)
  • On bottom ROP (m/hr)

SE /1000

(mj /Cu.m)

  • Bit Price ($)
  • Nozzles numbers and sizes
  • 11119703
  • Rock bit
  • 12 ¼
  • Security DBS

1292

  • 1.84

32.08

  • 13.7

7,800

3 * 18

  • 11258480
  • Rock bit
  • 12 ¼
  • Security DBS

1304

  • 1.82

35.56

  • 34.3

7,800

3 * 16

  • 11366593
  • Rock bit
  • 12 ¼
  • Security DBS

1312

  • 3.27

31.14

  • 27.2

14,091

3 * 18

  • 7211634
  • PDC
  • 8 ½
  • Hughes Christensen

1817

  • 9.84

24.55

  • 72.6

58,684

6 * 13

  • 7211633
  • PDC
  • 8 ½
  • Hughes Christensen

1418

  • 14.83

11.66

  • 204.4

68,988

6 * 14

  • 7125529
  • PDC
  • 8 ½
  • Hughes Christensen

1793

  • 14.66

32.25

  • 110.8

86,240

4 * 16




Result

  • The best recommended bits to drill 12 ¼ ‘’ and 8 ½’’ inch holes will respectively as follows


Bit serial No.

Bit type

Bit size (in)

Supplier

Drilled (m)

CPF ($/ft)

On bottom ROP (m/hr)

SE /1000

(mj /Cu.m)

Bit Price ($)

Nozzles numbers and sizes

  • 11258480
  • Rock bit
  • 12 ¼
  • Security DBS

1304

  • 1.82

35.56

  • 34.3

7,800

3 * 16

7211634

PDC

8 ½

Hughes Christensen

1817

9.84

24.55

72.6

58,684

6 * 13



  • Graphical output results 

CPF - Chart -1 

Best ROP for 12 ¼ ‘’  rock bit , SN 11119703

Best ROP for 8 ½  ‘’  PDC, SN 7211634



MSE- chart-3

MSE is valuable because it helps identify inefficiencies in the drilling process

Drillers should strive to keep MSE as low as possible and Rate of Penetration (ROP) as high as possible, by varying Weight on Bit (WOB), rotary speed, and mud flow within normal operating limits.

Drilling engineers want to hold MSE as close as possible to a formation’s true compressive strength. Unexpected changes in MSE may indicate changes in rock properties, or drilling inefficiency, or both.

 






I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING